버지니아 규제 타운홀
기관
형사 사법 서비스부
 
보드
형사 사법 서비스부
 
chapter
특별 성년후견인 관련 규정 [6 VAC 20 - 230 ]을 참고하세요.
이전 댓글     댓글 목록으로 돌아가기
12/10/12  5:00 오후
Commenter: Chris M. Roberts; G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.

Revise and update the SCOP program not eliminate it!
 

I strongly believe the SCOP program needs to be restructured to include strict qualifications of the companies,  of  the candidates applying to become a SCOP and to increase mandatory training to mirror other community policing programs across the United States. The 40 hours currently required does not scratch the service of what needs to be accomplished before an officer is allowed to function independently.

As far as making it unlawful to offer SCOP for hire or “profit”, I strongly disagree with this provision.  This is a service that private security companies are currently being solicited by municipalities, associations and private entities to help offset their rising costs or to increase their service response to their visitors, residents or employees.  In most municipalities cases we would only supplement their existing police force. There are many models that are highly successful today and I ask that you research and evaluate these programs before removing this option completely. By making the private security option to the entities listed above unlawful,  will more than likely  adversely affect their ability to fund their programs/budgets in the very near future. It would also prevent revenue and employment opportunities for small to large employers across the Commonwealth.

양해해 주셔서 감사합니다.

Chris M. Roberts

댓글ID: 24643